ORGANIC SEARCH EXECUTIVE

Michael Brown

The job was never ranking. It was being the answer, across organic growth and AI driven search, proven in revenue.

In AI visibility for online higher education, 5x the next source
#1
Incremental leads from a demand channel built in one year
4,000+
Paid search equivalent value of organic coverage added
$1M/mo
Brands run under a single owner at peak portfolio scale
80+
Portrait of Michael Brown

Current role

AVP, AEO

01 Focus

One discipline,
two surfaces.

Answer engine optimization is a combination of search engine optimization and generative engine optimization. The two operate in parallel and their strategies overlap, which is why the same stages and the same terminal metric carry straight across.

Answer Engine Optimization

Being the answer, wherever the answer is served.

SEO Tactics

+69%

Position one rankings

On a 32 partner university portfolio, while keyword footprint grew 41%: better positioned, not simply bigger. Fifteen years of the same discipline across six employers and portfolios reaching 80+ brands under a single owner.

  • Technical architecture, content systems, structured data and off site authority
  • Migration defense across 1.78M mapped links and redirects
  • Schema programs earning FAQ, HowTo and rich results
  • Local search turnarounds across multi campus networks

GEO Tactics

#1

Most cited domain

28.2% citation share across every major answer engine, roughly 5x the next source. Measured from 437 prompts tracked daily and 188,800 AI answers analyzed, benchmarked continuously against a live competitive set.

  • Seven engines instrumented daily: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, AI Mode, AI Overviews and Grok
  • Citation share treated as the durable authority metric, not visibility spikes
  • A GEO measurement framework mirroring the SEO one, stage for stage
  • Results reported monthly to a university president

One team, one framework, two surfaces. No separate AI budget line to defend, and no second reporting model to maintain.

02 Evidence

Cited, not claimed.

A number becomes evidence when you can say where it came from. Every figure here names its source: the export it was drawn from, the board presentation it was reported in, the business case it justified. The shape and the number can be checked against each other, and both against the document behind them.

AI visibility, non branded queries

Share of AI generated answers featuring each brand on non branded queries, across seven answer engines. Competitor names withheld.

CA 18.1%
Owned 16.6%
CB 16.4%
CC 14.5%
CD 12.3%

Non branded is the real contest. Only a 1.5 point lead when students don't search by name, which is why the strategy targets non branded topics rather than defending the easy branded number.

Ranking quality outgrew ranking quantity

19 months of keyword coverage against position one rankings, both indexed to month one so the two can be compared directly.

Position 1 rankings +70% Keyword footprint +34%

The portfolio didn't just get bigger. It got better positioned. Footprint grew 34% while position one rankings grew 70%. Coverage is easy to buy; position has to be earned.

Revenue grew 25× faster than traffic

One ecommerce account, true year over year. Traffic barely moved. Everything else did.

+3.9%

Sessions

+96.3%

Revenue

+109.7%

Transactions

+118.1%

Conversion rate

Pure conversion, not acquisition. Average order value actually fell 6%, so the entire gain came from converting more of the same visitors.

$11M in organic value, month after month

Non brand organic on one account, priced at what buying the same clicks would have cost. Five consecutive months from the reporting workbook.

Month 1 $2,305,237.94
Month 2 $2,249,011.77
Month 3 $2,364,964.80
Month 4 $2,130,949.18
Month 5 $1,968,707.26

Five month total $11,018,870.95

At the highest value segment, 61.8% of the terms winning organically were being bought in paid too. That is where a paid equivalent valuation stops being a number to admire and becomes an argument about where the budget should sit.

11 shown

28.2%

Citation share, the #1 cited domain across all AI platforms, roughly 5× the next source

816,300 citations tracked

9 / 10

Branded topics ranked first; second overall on the harder non branded battleground

188,800 answers analyzed

7

Answer engines instrumented daily, with the results a university president reads every month

437 prompts · 383 tags

60,000

Net new marketable keywords added, worth roughly $1M a month if the same coverage were bought in paid search

Executive review

+48%

Page one rankings year to date across a four institution portfolio

Board presentation

$17.5M

Organic value delivered on one education account, priced at a $44.73 average CPC

Business case, 2021

+95%

Year over year lead growth from embedded lead capture across a partner portfolio

Weekly program reporting

24 mo

Consecutive months of gains in a local search turnaround, with not one negative reading

Published case study

~30

In market tests run to a written hypothesis, each read three times before it counted as a win

Live experimentation log

32

University partners under one organic strategy, against a 12,600 lead annual target

Annual strategy plan

1.78M

Links and redirects mapped to protect rankings through platform migration

449K backlinks · 1.3M internal

03 History

Portfolios, not sites.

Every role has been multi brand, and every one has a before and an after. Open any role to see what moved, by how much, and off what starting number.

Eighteen years, six employers, one continuous thread. The outlined bar is a consulting practice running continuously since 2008, alongside all of them.

2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2026

Owns enterprise answer engine strategy across a four university system and corporate, directing an in house team and partnering with marketing, product, academic, compliance and executive stakeholders. Results go to the board and to a university president.

Three programs that did not exist before now run continuously. An AI visibility program instrumenting seven answer engines daily took the portfolio to the most cited domain in its category, roughly 5x the next source. A 30/60/90 experimentation model across five brands ended the internal argument about what organic was worth. A faculty content engine turned 48 subject matter experts into published authors at volume. Defensive work ran alongside all of it: platform migrations and a four catalog consolidation, with every link, redirect and ranking signal mapped before the switch.

Migration defense meant mapping 448,998 backlinks, 1,335,903 internal links and 20,344 redirects before anything moved. Rankings are easy to lose in a replatform and expensive to win back.

Metric Before → after
Page one rankings (YTD) +48%
Organic traffic, optimized program pages +28% YoY
Incremental leads from a new channel → 4,000+ new
Net new marketable keywords 60,000 ~$1M/mo paid equiv.
AI branded visibility 71.8% #1, 4x next
AI citation share 28.2% #1 domain
Local grid rank 20.86 → 15.22 +27%
Reviews per 30 days 16 → 111 ~7x

41 industries, 6 employers

American Public Education1 2U, Inc.1 Jellyfish7 R+L Carriers18 Ocoos2 Independent Consulting19 Higher education Ecommerce Resorts Hotels Telecommunications Athletic footwear Home improvement retail Fleet leasing SaaS Freight Logistics Marketing agencies Equestrian sport Trade associations Life sciences Footwear components Retail centers Restaurants Catering Rental properties Chiavari chairs Exercise equipment Insulation machinery Water bottle manufacture Mulch Wood pellets Fertilizer Banking Property technology Online marketplaces Industrial IT services Art sales Electricians Carpentry Home builders Site developers Livestock feed Title agencies Legal Sports clubs

04 Method

Fix the measurement
first.

Organic programs get cut first when nobody can prove what they returned. Fixing that is the first thing I do in a role. The same four stages have now run at three employers, more formal each time, and everything inside them runs as a test: a hypothesis written before the work starts, a declared way to judge it, a named data source, and readings at 30, 60 and 90 days.

Opportunity

  • Keyword footprint
  • Rankings
  • SERP features

Acquisition

  • Impressions
  • Clicks
  • Sessions

Engagement

  • Conversion rate
  • Transactions
  • Reviews

Commercial

  • Leads & applications
  • Revenue
  • Organic value
Goals weighted toward the revenue end +12% Leads +10% Rankings +5% Sessions

SEO Tactics

SEO Testing Measurement Framework

Metric 30 60 90

Opportunity

Footprint · Rankings · Features

Acquisition

Clicks / Views · Impressions · Sessions

Engagement

Leads: RFIs, inquiries, MQLs

Conversions

Sales, applications, signups

Revenue

Pipeline, bookings, order value

GEO Tactics

GEO Testing Measurement Framework

Metric 30 60 90

Visibility

Visibility Score · Rank · Share of Voice

Citation & sentiment

Sentiment · Citation Share · Citation Rank

Engagement

Leads: RFIs, inquiries, MQLs

Conversions

Sales, applications, signups

Revenue

Pipeline, bookings, order value

Same structure, two surfaces, one destination. Whatever a business actually counts, whether leads, conversions or revenue, sits at the bottom of both frameworks, and nothing gets reported as a win until it reaches there. Generative search did not need a new measurement model. It needed the existing one pointed at a new surface.

Read at 30 days

Engagement and conversion

Time on page, bounce, exit rate, and conversion rate. These move first, so they are read first. The opening goal is protective: ensure no drop in conversion.

Read at 45 to 60 days

Rankings and sessions

Page one rankings, top five positions, organic sessions, and branded versus non branded split. Rankings lag, so reading them early produces noise rather than signal.

Read at 90 days

Direction, not a verdict

The third reading is what separates a real gain from a spike. Several tests look strong at 30 days and decay by 90. That is the point of reading three times.

Where it gets tried first

Nothing reaches a roadmap straight from a theory. I run a set of live properties as the testbed: independent domains in unrelated verticals, real traffic and real indexing, where a hypothesis can ship, run and be read at 30 days with nothing riding on the outcome. What survives there is what gets proposed at work.

05 Validation

Fourteen people,
on the record.

Managers, direct reports, agency colleagues, clients and a partner CEO, spanning four employers and a decade. Ordered by what tends to decide an executive hire: judgment under pressure, ownership without supervision, and whether people asked to work with me again.

Internal attestation
“I'll never forget when the CMO turned to me after our SEO review in the QBR and said 'Who is this guy? He's really good.' That was in 2019, and he's continued to impress since.”

VP, Client Management

Global digital agency · 2021

Internal attestation
“The account is a major commercial driver for the SEO capability as a whole, and stands within the top 2 of revenue driving SEO programs globally. Through his stewardship we increased annual fees by over 15%, and introduced the client to new capabilities globally.”

VP, SEO

Global digital agency · 2021

Internal attestation
“A 360 degree 'force' in SEO, great with clients, a highly valued mentor to the team, innovative, data driven, with a strong track record in delivering exponential growth for some of our largest flagship clients.”

Chief Solutions Officer, Earned Media

Global digital agency · 2021

Internal attestation
“He has been absolutely pivotal to our largest university relationship. Our SEO team carries enormous visibility and responsibility to C level and VP level client contacts. He navigates those relationships effortlessly, building trust through sophisticated technical knowledge and a consultative manner.”

Client Partner

Global digital agency · 2021

Public recommendation
“One of the true SEOs who understands the integrity and responsibility of the role. He is the last to make guarantees and the first to recommend a test to prove out site data and theories. As strong as his skills are, and they are some of the best I have ever seen, his work ethic is second to none.”

IT & Marketing Director

Managed Michael directly · June 2018

Internal attestation
“He has led the charge on delivering value through training and process efficiency, equipping those he mentors with skills to advance their careers, and developing processes that automate time consuming workflows, improving margins scalably across major pieces of the portfolio.”

VP, SEO

Global digital agency · 2021

Public recommendation
“He had the foresight and drive to envision an eventual partnership between our association and his company. He has always conducted himself in a professional manner, and he is an asset to any organization he is a part of.”

Chief Executive Officer

National sports governing body · April 2015

Internal attestation
“He takes a very complex subject and breaks it down in a way that instills confidence and trust among various stakeholders. I readily bring him to client meetings, he is quick on his feet. We are fortunate to have him at the helm of our SEO efforts.”

Executive Director, Digital Marketing

University client · 2021

Internal attestation
“I have witnessed him coach literally everyone on our U.S. team and lead global knowledge shares. He taught me skill sets I thought were out of reach for my background, and built tools our team uses daily. He is a pillar to our team's success and growth.”

SEO Manager · peer

Global digital agency · 2021

Public recommendation
“He is not only the best SEO I've had the pleasure to meet, but also an excellent manager. He is extremely knowledgeable and always ready to share his expertise. I really grew as an SEO from collaborating with him.”

SEO Director

Former direct report · June 2018

Public recommendation
“As SEO/SEM Manager he had a considerable number of responsibilities and handled them effortlessly, communicating effectively with both team members and leadership. He developed strong leadership and interpersonal skills that have been praised unanimously by colleagues.”

Manager, Digital Marketing & Web

Former direct report · July 2018

Public recommendation
“He has a passion for SEO that is infectious. Even better, he is a manager who enjoys sharing his knowledge. He truly understands that success is driven by the entire team. I attribute much of what I have learned about SEO to him.”

SEO Manager

Former direct report · June 2018

Public recommendation
“He is an expert in communicating extensive and technical knowledge to clients in a way that sets them at ease and builds a trusting relationship. In a fast paced agency environment under tight deadlines, he was always the positive force in the room.”

Sr Account Director

Agency colleague · July 2017

Public recommendation
“He always showed initiative in finding new ways or tools to improve things, from company processes to small daily tasks. His commitment, his ability to work well with others, and that initiative make him a great asset to any organization.”

Marketing Director

Managed Michael directly · January 2017

14 on record

Six of the fourteen speak specifically to leading people, and they come from managers, peers and direct reports independently rather than from one source. One former direct report now works for him again, at a different company, seven years later.

06 Tooling

Depth, not a
checklist of logos.

67 tools across eight subjects. Open a subject to see what sits behind it: the top tier is reserved for tools that were extended or had a methodology built on top of them, and those carry the system they became.

Architect · built systems on it Advanced · owned in delivery Applied · used with output Working knowledge

Architect 2

Profound

A 437 prompt AI measurement program.

ChatGPT

Advanced 6

  • Surfer SEO
  • Perplexity
  • Copilot
  • Gemini
  • Anthropic API
  • OpenAI API

Applied 2

  • Peec
  • Waikay

Architect means a system or methodology was built on top of the tool, not that the buttons are familiar. Advanced means it produced work that clients and boards acted on.

07 Credentials

Qualified, certified,
and used to explaining it.

A computing degree underneath fifteen years of marketing. It is why the technical work goes as deep as it does, why the tooling gets built rather than bought, and why engineering teams treat the specs as engineering specs.

Education

  • B.S., Computer Information Systems

    Saint Leo University, 2009 to 2011

  • A.S., Computer Information Technology

    College of Central Florida, 2005 to 2008

Certifications

  • BrightEdge Professional Certification

    Enterprise SEO platform

  • Data Integration Expert Certification

    Analytics and data pipelines

Let's Connect